After smiling and dialing and wining and dining my sources for inside info- let's mock it up. I will only do the first 10 picks because anything more is a waste of time.
1. KC- Luke Joeckel, OT, Texas A&M
Andy Reid usually drafts players smaller than himself but he's willing to make an exception.
2. JAC- Eric Fisher, OT, Central Michigan
Where's Blaine? How about a Tebow trade? Whoever is back there, the Jags are banking on Joe Staley comparisons.
3. OAK- Dion Jordan, DE, Oregon
Trade potential here. No Kelley or Seymour but don't expect the unexpected from Al's ghost. The Silver and Black enlist an athletic pass rusher remind them of Derrick Burgess and better days. Maybe Ansah. Maybe Milliner. On second thought, who knows...
4. PHI- Lane Johnson, OT, Oklahoma
As a top finisher in 6 of 7 categories including an impressive 4.72 40, he's worthy of protecting a dynamic QB and playing in a dynamic offense.
5. DET- Dee Milliner, CB, Alabama
Beware Rodgers, Cutler, and Ponder. I won't use the term "shutdown corner" because there's usually only 1-2 real "shutdown corners" in the league at a time... despite a huge number of prospects bearing such label.
6. CLE- Ezekiel "Ziggy" Ansah, DE, BYU
Great physical tools but limited production over a small body of work make him a liability in the top 5, pick 6 should be ok.
7. ARI- Jonathan Cooper, OG, North Carolina
When was the last time a guard was taken in the top 10? Chris Naeole at No. 10 by the Saints in 1997.
8. BUF- Geno Smith, QB, West Virginia
Since 1966, the Bills have drafted 2 QBs in the first round (Jim Kelly and JP Losman). Why Geno? Kolb, Tavaris, Brad Smith. Why not Tavon Austin? They don't actually want him, they want the Jets to trade up. Or they could go OL for Spiller's sake.
9. NYJ- Tavon Austin, WR, WestVirginia
While most coaches are coy and cagey, Rex Ryan is the type of big mouth to talk about a playerand then actually draft him. They could go with the best name in the draft, Barkevious Mingo.
10. TEN- Sharrif Floyd, DT, Florida
This is a value pick since the Raiders passed on him.
19.4.13
Shane Donahue's 2013 Freaks of the NFL Combine Report
The NFL Draft is just a week away but instead of prognosticating, I decided to look backwards and highlight some of the standouts of the NFL Combine, as is tradition.
Like I say every year, the combine does not grade football talent, it grades the physical talent required to play football at a highest level. The freaks are the physical specimen who look good in spandex and nail the measurables.
MARGUS HUNT, DE, SMU, 6-8, 277
First, how does a 6-8, 280 guy run a 4.6 40 AND lead the combine with 38 reps on the bench press? He was also a top-10 finished among linemen in the vertical (34.5"), broad (10'1"), and 3-cone drill (7.07). The Estonian won Gold in the discus and shot put at the 2006 World Junior Championships which tells me he is a technician since the discus throw is one of the most intricate and elaborate movements in sports. He used his length to block a near NCAA record 17 kicks, earning him the nickname the "Eastern Block."And he's only been playing football for... four years.
JAMIE COLLINS, OLB, SOUTHERN MISS, 6-3, 250
He has what some call "stupid ups." He set a Combine record in the broad jump, levitating to 11'7" and was second this year with a 41.5" vertical. By position, he was 4th in the 40 (4.64), 5th in the 3-cone (7.10), and 2nd in the 60-yard shuttle (11.55).
EZEKIEL "ZIGGY" ANSAH, DE, BYU, 6-5, 271
This walk-on from Ghana gave football a shot when basketball and track didn't pan out. Three years later, he's a potential top 10 pick. The smooth runner led linemen with a 4.26 20-yard shuttle and posted a 4.63 40, 6th best among linemen.
MARQUISE GOODWIN, WR, TEXAS, 5-9, 183
He posted the fastest 40 in this year's Combine with a 4.27, 0.03 seconds off Chris Johnson's timing-era record. I'm somewhat surprised he was only 6th overall with a ridiculous broad jump of 11' considering he nabbed 10th place in the long jump at the London Olympics. In the few seconds I saw of the gauntlet, I think he's more of a track guy than a football player.
BARKEVIOUS MINGO, DE, LSU vs. TREVARDO WILLIAMS, DE, UCONN
(Parentheses denote rank among position)
Williams also put up 30 reps on the bench while Mingo was 6th in the 20-yard shuttle with a time of 4.29. The numbers are pretty close, what's the difference?
Besides having a slightly better name, Mingo will be at Radio City on Thursday and may be one of the first 10 to shake the commish's hand. Williams will watch from a couch and waiting for a phone call.
Like I say every year, the combine does not grade football talent, it grades the physical talent required to play football at a highest level. The freaks are the physical specimen who look good in spandex and nail the measurables.
MARGUS HUNT, DE, SMU, 6-8, 277
First, how does a 6-8, 280 guy run a 4.6 40 AND lead the combine with 38 reps on the bench press? He was also a top-10 finished among linemen in the vertical (34.5"), broad (10'1"), and 3-cone drill (7.07). The Estonian won Gold in the discus and shot put at the 2006 World Junior Championships which tells me he is a technician since the discus throw is one of the most intricate and elaborate movements in sports. He used his length to block a near NCAA record 17 kicks, earning him the nickname the "Eastern Block."And he's only been playing football for... four years.
JAMIE COLLINS, OLB, SOUTHERN MISS, 6-3, 250
He has what some call "stupid ups." He set a Combine record in the broad jump, levitating to 11'7" and was second this year with a 41.5" vertical. By position, he was 4th in the 40 (4.64), 5th in the 3-cone (7.10), and 2nd in the 60-yard shuttle (11.55).
EZEKIEL "ZIGGY" ANSAH, DE, BYU, 6-5, 271
This walk-on from Ghana gave football a shot when basketball and track didn't pan out. Three years later, he's a potential top 10 pick. The smooth runner led linemen with a 4.26 20-yard shuttle and posted a 4.63 40, 6th best among linemen.
MARQUISE GOODWIN, WR, TEXAS, 5-9, 183
He posted the fastest 40 in this year's Combine with a 4.27, 0.03 seconds off Chris Johnson's timing-era record. I'm somewhat surprised he was only 6th overall with a ridiculous broad jump of 11' considering he nabbed 10th place in the long jump at the London Olympics. In the few seconds I saw of the gauntlet, I think he's more of a track guy than a football player.
BARKEVIOUS MINGO, DE, LSU vs. TREVARDO WILLIAMS, DE, UCONN
HT | WT | 40 YD | Vert | Broad | 3-Cone | ||
BM | 6’4” | 241 | 4.58 (2) | 37" (2) | 10’8” (1) | 6.64 (1) | |
| TW | 6’1” | 241 | 4.57 (1) | 38" (1) | 10’4” (3) | - |
Williams also put up 30 reps on the bench while Mingo was 6th in the 20-yard shuttle with a time of 4.29. The numbers are pretty close, what's the difference?
Besides having a slightly better name, Mingo will be at Radio City on Thursday and may be one of the first 10 to shake the commish's hand. Williams will watch from a couch and waiting for a phone call.
16.12.12
Are Screen Protectors a Racket?
Imagine a salesman is pitching a iPhone screen protector that's made from the same military grade material used on helicopter blades and space shuttles and has self-healing properties. This thin piece of plastic film can be yours for only $25-50 -- would you call BULLSHIT?
I would.
In a $2 billion cell phone case market that I have already deemed a racket, Zagg makes such claims with their nano-memory technology.
I'd like more detail about these "features" because slapping nano on a gimmicky name and defining it as "visible as a very subtle texture in the surface of the film" is a shameless attempt at jargon marketing. True to bullshit, it sounds good initially but comes undone upon closer examination. First, it's not nano if you can see it. Nano refers to nanotechnology or nanomolecular i.e. one billionth of a meter. Zagg says and I paraphrase that the nano-memory technology make it
1. self-healing
2. pliable and flexible for corner coverage
3. easy to install
4. drop-resistant
5. glare-resistant orange peel texture.
1. Self-healing plastics actually DO exist, thanks to a layered polymer. I question whether Zagg uses this technology and whether Zagg itself is military-grade. 3M has the market cornered on aerospace polyurethane tape which costs $3000 for 36 yards or $2/ sq. inch. XPEL makes self-healing paint-protection kits for cars for $29-$700, $29 for the luggage area which I take to mean the strip next to the trunk opening (still a larger area than a phone screen). Granted these are different products with more layers and different uses but I think Zagg is piggybacking on this concept. According to their wiki, Zagg began in 2005 in a backyard shed in Salt Lake City selling iPod screens- that's not a military-grade background.
2. Any screen should cover the corner if they cut it to the right size- what does the subtle texture and molecules have to do with it?
3. Best Buy charges $7.99 for installation so how easy can it be?
4. "Improved grip makes it easier to hang onto your expensive gadgets." So the screen has nothing to do with surviving the drop- this is really just no-slip grip.
5. This is the one component that actually refers to the texture though orange peel is not nano because as I said before, one can see it.
So after breaking down this poor copy and researching their roots, I'm skeptical of Zagg. Amazon reviews raise concern as well.
Most screens these days are made from chemically treated glass to be scratch resistant so is the screen protector necessary?
To scratch the screen, the object must be harder than the screen. Such is the science of hardness. Many helpful videos show that keys, knives, and razor blades WILL NOT scratch the screen. This helpful video shows that a nail file and a dremel WILL scratch the screen. Diamonds probably will too so never carry your iphone in your pocket full of diamonds.
Essentially, scratches are not the issue. The video shows that the screen can prevent the glass from breaking in a 15-foot drop. So the biggest benefit of the screen protector is the impact-resistance which is hardly promoted. Why does a thin screen protector do a better job protecting against a fall than some of the bulky silicone and plastic cases that are marketed specifically for that purpose (meant for a 6-foot drop)?
Let's look at laminated glass used in windshields. A resin bond between two layers of glass increases strength and keeps the shards together when cracked. I'm no expert but I imagine the extra strength comes from the resin bond and layers allowing energy to disperse through the whole windshield. Bullet-proof glass takes this concept to the next level by layering and laminating polycarbonate plastic between glass. Here's Mythbusters take.
How about a screen protector making an iPhone bullet-resistant? Clearplex, a Utah-based windshield screen manufacturer made a huge splash with their clever ads. Outside of stopping bullets, there are no outrageous claims- just a screen that's clearer and smoother than Zagg. However, there must be a reason he used a shotgun shell instead of a bullet- perhaps less force from the dispersed buckshot. Also the covered iPhone had only one mark from buckshot but the uncovered had several, why is that?
Here's a rundown of some popular cases based on scouring Amazon and forums:
Clearplex- not many reviews out there but durability, feel and clarity seem to be a plus. There was one bad review that said the edges were not cut properly and peeled up which is a huge issue.
Zagg- sticky feel and orange peel texture are bad, annoying to install but some swear by it
Moshi- because I don't like the idea of bubbles, lint and the wet install, I thought dry install would be good but this one leaves a rainbow haze which is bad
3M- thick and reduces screen clarity so no go
Spigen SGP Glas.tR- rates well but 4mm of glass on top of glass seems stupid, is it just me?
Buff Labs- nice video but may have to buy on ebay and I avoid that for certain goods
Belkin- dry application and totally clear according to 3/3 five-star reviews on Amazon.
It comes down to Clearplex and Belkin with each around $15 though Belkin is a 3-pack. I'm intimidated by the wet application of Clearplex but I don't know if Belkin would have the same impact protection. Is it a special material that protects or is it the nature of laminated glass?
When I was 10 or so, I bought a Fisher Space Pen that could write upside-down and underwater. I put the crappy hotel pen to the same tests and it could also write upside-down and underwater. Go figure. Americans spent millions developing the space pen- Russians used a pencil.
What do I use?
I'm rocking leather case from PreserveTheWord on Etsy (roughman with teal stitch) and I love it! It's handsome and I like the feel.
I went by the Apple store to browse screen protectors and a "genius" rubbed her screen with her metal ring to show me it doesn't need a protector. While I appreciated her honesty at trying to get me NOT to buy something, I explained that I don't need scratch protection and I'm more concerned with impact and stray bullets. My laminated glass discourse may have been lost on her.
Maybe I'll just keep it naked in the leather case, like going commando with leather chaps...
I would.
In a $2 billion cell phone case market that I have already deemed a racket, Zagg makes such claims with their nano-memory technology.
I'd like more detail about these "features" because slapping nano on a gimmicky name and defining it as "visible as a very subtle texture in the surface of the film" is a shameless attempt at jargon marketing. True to bullshit, it sounds good initially but comes undone upon closer examination. First, it's not nano if you can see it. Nano refers to nanotechnology or nanomolecular i.e. one billionth of a meter. Zagg says and I paraphrase that the nano-memory technology make it
1. self-healing
2. pliable and flexible for corner coverage
3. easy to install
4. drop-resistant
5. glare-resistant orange peel texture.
1. Self-healing plastics actually DO exist, thanks to a layered polymer. I question whether Zagg uses this technology and whether Zagg itself is military-grade. 3M has the market cornered on aerospace polyurethane tape which costs $3000 for 36 yards or $2/ sq. inch. XPEL makes self-healing paint-protection kits for cars for $29-$700, $29 for the luggage area which I take to mean the strip next to the trunk opening (still a larger area than a phone screen). Granted these are different products with more layers and different uses but I think Zagg is piggybacking on this concept. According to their wiki, Zagg began in 2005 in a backyard shed in Salt Lake City selling iPod screens- that's not a military-grade background.
2. Any screen should cover the corner if they cut it to the right size- what does the subtle texture and molecules have to do with it?
3. Best Buy charges $7.99 for installation so how easy can it be?
4. "Improved grip makes it easier to hang onto your expensive gadgets." So the screen has nothing to do with surviving the drop- this is really just no-slip grip.
5. This is the one component that actually refers to the texture though orange peel is not nano because as I said before, one can see it.
So after breaking down this poor copy and researching their roots, I'm skeptical of Zagg. Amazon reviews raise concern as well.
Most screens these days are made from chemically treated glass to be scratch resistant so is the screen protector necessary?
To scratch the screen, the object must be harder than the screen. Such is the science of hardness. Many helpful videos show that keys, knives, and razor blades WILL NOT scratch the screen. This helpful video shows that a nail file and a dremel WILL scratch the screen. Diamonds probably will too so never carry your iphone in your pocket full of diamonds.
Essentially, scratches are not the issue. The video shows that the screen can prevent the glass from breaking in a 15-foot drop. So the biggest benefit of the screen protector is the impact-resistance which is hardly promoted. Why does a thin screen protector do a better job protecting against a fall than some of the bulky silicone and plastic cases that are marketed specifically for that purpose (meant for a 6-foot drop)?
Let's look at laminated glass used in windshields. A resin bond between two layers of glass increases strength and keeps the shards together when cracked. I'm no expert but I imagine the extra strength comes from the resin bond and layers allowing energy to disperse through the whole windshield. Bullet-proof glass takes this concept to the next level by layering and laminating polycarbonate plastic between glass. Here's Mythbusters take.
How about a screen protector making an iPhone bullet-resistant? Clearplex, a Utah-based windshield screen manufacturer made a huge splash with their clever ads. Outside of stopping bullets, there are no outrageous claims- just a screen that's clearer and smoother than Zagg. However, there must be a reason he used a shotgun shell instead of a bullet- perhaps less force from the dispersed buckshot. Also the covered iPhone had only one mark from buckshot but the uncovered had several, why is that?
Here's a rundown of some popular cases based on scouring Amazon and forums:
Clearplex- not many reviews out there but durability, feel and clarity seem to be a plus. There was one bad review that said the edges were not cut properly and peeled up which is a huge issue.
Zagg- sticky feel and orange peel texture are bad, annoying to install but some swear by it
Moshi- because I don't like the idea of bubbles, lint and the wet install, I thought dry install would be good but this one leaves a rainbow haze which is bad
3M- thick and reduces screen clarity so no go
Spigen SGP Glas.tR- rates well but 4mm of glass on top of glass seems stupid, is it just me?
Buff Labs- nice video but may have to buy on ebay and I avoid that for certain goods
Belkin- dry application and totally clear according to 3/3 five-star reviews on Amazon.
It comes down to Clearplex and Belkin with each around $15 though Belkin is a 3-pack. I'm intimidated by the wet application of Clearplex but I don't know if Belkin would have the same impact protection. Is it a special material that protects or is it the nature of laminated glass?
When I was 10 or so, I bought a Fisher Space Pen that could write upside-down and underwater. I put the crappy hotel pen to the same tests and it could also write upside-down and underwater. Go figure. Americans spent millions developing the space pen- Russians used a pencil.
What do I use?
I'm rocking leather case from PreserveTheWord on Etsy (roughman with teal stitch) and I love it! It's handsome and I like the feel.
I went by the Apple store to browse screen protectors and a "genius" rubbed her screen with her metal ring to show me it doesn't need a protector. While I appreciated her honesty at trying to get me NOT to buy something, I explained that I don't need scratch protection and I'm more concerned with impact and stray bullets. My laminated glass discourse may have been lost on her.
Maybe I'll just keep it naked in the leather case, like going commando with leather chaps...
2.12.12
The Cell Phone Case Racket
I have never liked the idea of protective cases or covers (except for cars and that's only when not in use) but for a small, fumble-able phone that acts like and costs as much as a cheap computer; these cases are a widely-accepted necessity. More like a necessary evil but most people bought into the craze and now celebrate them as decoration. Why? What good is a thin, clean design if it's covered up with a fat and ugly case?
And why is a simple plastic case $30? Or rubber or silicon or a mix for $40? This is a racket! It was a $2.1 billion industry in 2009.
I'd rather my phone go naked but just in case...
I found a website called Monoprice where cases cost about what one would expect- $3 for a basic rubber and plastic and $7 for a leather wallet type. Monoprice is known for affordable cables and good $10 headphones.
Why and how do they sell products closer to cost?
And why is a simple plastic case $30? Or rubber or silicon or a mix for $40? This is a racket! It was a $2.1 billion industry in 2009.
I'd rather my phone go naked but just in case...
I found a website called Monoprice where cases cost about what one would expect- $3 for a basic rubber and plastic and $7 for a leather wallet type. Monoprice is known for affordable cables and good $10 headphones.
Why and how do they sell products closer to cost?
4.11.12
Sunglasses- To Buy or Not To Buy
I have been noncommittally in the market for a pair of sunglasses for several years now since I don't really wear the clunky Bottega Venettas my grandma rescued from the discount bin at the optometrist. (Nice leather case but not my style anyway). I don't have many occasions to wear sunglasses but who does- style trumps function in eyewear these days.
Ever since seeing my mom wearing slick black Ray-Bans in my baby photos, I've always wanted a pair. My dad emailed me about a $69 one-day sale on eBay for wayfarers but it just didn't feel right. No matter what presidents and celebs sport them, Ray-Bans are now too ubiquitous to be cool (the prevalence of cap and gown grads in wayfarers comes to mind). I also don't like the logo on the lens and frame which promotes the brand while "elevating" the user, but such is the nature of brands.
I thought about holding out for folding Persols because I misremembered that my mom had a pair of those too. Then I saw a piece on 60 Minutes about an Italian company named Luxottica that designs, manufactures, or outright owns just about every brand name/designer sunglass make like Ray Ban, Persol, Oakley, Prada, DG, Tiffany, and on. They also own Sunglass Hut, Target optical, Peale Vision, and vision-care company EyeMed so they control production, distribution, and even some prescription. This means they control the price. The 60 Minutes segment may be one-sided but it made some good points despite the fact that Lesley Stahl bugs me. She was very soft on Barney Frank but asked pointed questions of Luxottica CEO Andrea Guerra. Stahl's monopoly allegations aside, Guerra consistently oozed insincerity and that rubbed me the wrong way.
I'm not saying Luxottica doesn't make a quality product; I just don't think it worth what they charge and the CEO did not instill buyer confidence. Is Luxottica a monopoly or just a dominant business with a good product and model? I can't tell you but I'd rather skip the price-fixing and support an indie.
I asked google "sunglasses not owned by Luxottica" and came to this forum which started with a question from a guy also interested in Ray-Bans and Persols. There were many recommendations- Randolph Engineering, Maui Jim, American Optical, Mykita, Derome Berrener, Orgreen, Dita, 999.9, Facial Index, Salt, Reiz, Cutler and Gross. Many of them imitated the wayfarers and had the all-too trendy minimalist black helvetica or gothic on white site design.
I particularly liked Warby and Parker which was mentioned in the segment. It's presentation reminded me of Bonobos or Frank and Oak and it has a compassionate consumerism ethos similar to Toms.
Whatever I decide to buy, I guess it can wait...
Ever since seeing my mom wearing slick black Ray-Bans in my baby photos, I've always wanted a pair. My dad emailed me about a $69 one-day sale on eBay for wayfarers but it just didn't feel right. No matter what presidents and celebs sport them, Ray-Bans are now too ubiquitous to be cool (the prevalence of cap and gown grads in wayfarers comes to mind). I also don't like the logo on the lens and frame which promotes the brand while "elevating" the user, but such is the nature of brands.
I thought about holding out for folding Persols because I misremembered that my mom had a pair of those too. Then I saw a piece on 60 Minutes about an Italian company named Luxottica that designs, manufactures, or outright owns just about every brand name/designer sunglass make like Ray Ban, Persol, Oakley, Prada, DG, Tiffany, and on. They also own Sunglass Hut, Target optical, Peale Vision, and vision-care company EyeMed so they control production, distribution, and even some prescription. This means they control the price. The 60 Minutes segment may be one-sided but it made some good points despite the fact that Lesley Stahl bugs me. She was very soft on Barney Frank but asked pointed questions of Luxottica CEO Andrea Guerra. Stahl's monopoly allegations aside, Guerra consistently oozed insincerity and that rubbed me the wrong way.
I'm not saying Luxottica doesn't make a quality product; I just don't think it worth what they charge and the CEO did not instill buyer confidence. Is Luxottica a monopoly or just a dominant business with a good product and model? I can't tell you but I'd rather skip the price-fixing and support an indie.
I asked google "sunglasses not owned by Luxottica" and came to this forum which started with a question from a guy also interested in Ray-Bans and Persols. There were many recommendations- Randolph Engineering, Maui Jim, American Optical, Mykita, Derome Berrener, Orgreen, Dita, 999.9, Facial Index, Salt, Reiz, Cutler and Gross. Many of them imitated the wayfarers and had the all-too trendy minimalist black helvetica or gothic on white site design.
I particularly liked Warby and Parker which was mentioned in the segment. It's presentation reminded me of Bonobos or Frank and Oak and it has a compassionate consumerism ethos similar to Toms.
Whatever I decide to buy, I guess it can wait...
5.10.12
A('s) Box Office Blunder
For someone who doesn't like baseball anymore (another story), even I LOVE this A’s team. It’s easy to be dissatisfied with an organization run by an owner set on cutting costs and relocating; but when great baseball sprouts from a group of rookie contracters and castoffs that earns the MLB’s smallest payroll- I notice.
Well, my best friend did. I thought it was another AAA team posing as major-leaguers while stuck in the Wolfe-Beane relocation purgatory. My friend convinced me this band of underdogs was special- something to prove with nothing to lose. He was so sure that he bought tickets to the final 31 home games- and so began the Anti-Movement Movement to keep the A’s in Oakland. This is the bizarre tale not of A’s success, but of that purchase.
With 81 home games, 31 games is over a third of a season and costs over $800 for a pair of bleacher seats- no small investment. One would imagine that such a large order would come with a discount.
My friend asked a ticket sales representative about a package. With the intonation and slow nod of a seedy salesman who wants to be your bro, the rep said, “Yeaaahhh, I can’t get you tickets for this season but what I can do is put you on our waiting list for 2013 season tickets, with a deposit." But that's next year, I want tickets for this year! "Yeaahhh, we’re kinda focusing on next year.”
What?! The A’s are playing their best baseball since 2006, the time is now! Wouldn’t a Playoff Push Package be a good way to promote the current success and boost sales? Instead of asking for contact info to follow up with lame calls (which my friend didn't answer), shouldn’t the rep ask (or at least pretend to ask) a supervisor if they can offer group pricing or some other discount or added value for someone making such a large purchase. How long would that take? That awareness could go a long way in showing the customer he matters.
Confused but undeterred, my friend went to the ticket window and ordered. The ticket ops lady said, “So are you like a real fan or a bandwagoner?” Really?!
Good tactic- belittle a customer and challenge his fandom just as he is about to drop $800. The problem is 1) he didn’t think it was sarcasm and 2) if it was, then it wasn’t funny 3) as much as I love sarcasm, it has no place in sales. How about a sincere “thank you for your support, is there anything else I can do for you”? If one must joke, why not say “welcome aboard the bandwagon” followed by a chuckle. Even that may be pushing it.
The sad part is that the A’s have enough trouble attracting fans without the employees scaring off the ones who do show. I can't judge the ticket sales office on this single experience, but I will say that there’s only one first impression and two staffers shit the bed. To all the A's sales reps- please sell some tickets with integrity and help keep the A's in Oakland.
Although the ticket sales office may have missed an opportunity to properly serve a loyal customer and promote one of the best second half finishes imaginable, the story of the regular season ends well. Vegas had the A’s winning 71 games but they caught lightning in a bottle with pitching (2nd in AL with 3.48 ERA, best since 1990), homeruns (led ML with 112 after All-Star break), 14 walk-off wins, and the Bernie.
I recommend the ticket sales office sell playoff tickets to the bandwagoners lining up for 2013 season tickets.
Well, my best friend did. I thought it was another AAA team posing as major-leaguers while stuck in the Wolfe-Beane relocation purgatory. My friend convinced me this band of underdogs was special- something to prove with nothing to lose. He was so sure that he bought tickets to the final 31 home games- and so began the Anti-Movement Movement to keep the A’s in Oakland. This is the bizarre tale not of A’s success, but of that purchase.
With 81 home games, 31 games is over a third of a season and costs over $800 for a pair of bleacher seats- no small investment. One would imagine that such a large order would come with a discount.
My friend asked a ticket sales representative about a package. With the intonation and slow nod of a seedy salesman who wants to be your bro, the rep said, “Yeaaahhh, I can’t get you tickets for this season but what I can do is put you on our waiting list for 2013 season tickets, with a deposit." But that's next year, I want tickets for this year! "Yeaahhh, we’re kinda focusing on next year.”
What?! The A’s are playing their best baseball since 2006, the time is now! Wouldn’t a Playoff Push Package be a good way to promote the current success and boost sales? Instead of asking for contact info to follow up with lame calls (which my friend didn't answer), shouldn’t the rep ask (or at least pretend to ask) a supervisor if they can offer group pricing or some other discount or added value for someone making such a large purchase. How long would that take? That awareness could go a long way in showing the customer he matters.
Confused but undeterred, my friend went to the ticket window and ordered. The ticket ops lady said, “So are you like a real fan or a bandwagoner?” Really?!
Good tactic- belittle a customer and challenge his fandom just as he is about to drop $800. The problem is 1) he didn’t think it was sarcasm and 2) if it was, then it wasn’t funny 3) as much as I love sarcasm, it has no place in sales. How about a sincere “thank you for your support, is there anything else I can do for you”? If one must joke, why not say “welcome aboard the bandwagon” followed by a chuckle. Even that may be pushing it.
The sad part is that the A’s have enough trouble attracting fans without the employees scaring off the ones who do show. I can't judge the ticket sales office on this single experience, but I will say that there’s only one first impression and two staffers shit the bed. To all the A's sales reps- please sell some tickets with integrity and help keep the A's in Oakland.
Although the ticket sales office may have missed an opportunity to properly serve a loyal customer and promote one of the best second half finishes imaginable, the story of the regular season ends well. Vegas had the A’s winning 71 games but they caught lightning in a bottle with pitching (2nd in AL with 3.48 ERA, best since 1990), homeruns (led ML with 112 after All-Star break), 14 walk-off wins, and the Bernie.
I recommend the ticket sales office sell playoff tickets to the bandwagoners lining up for 2013 season tickets.
8.8.12
Made In Europe, Shipped From China = FAKE
My cousin bought FAKE Babolat Pro Hurricane Tour from tennis.cn and Luxilon Big Banger ALU Power from lixingjun2010 on eBay. He said they had 100% positive feedback with 100+ sales. I investigated and found that a dummy bidder nishiki82 accounts for most of the sales and same-day positive feedback.
The string labels and barcodes are convincing and match the real stuff. However, the string broke after five minutes of play, raising suspicion of its authenticity. Other than playing, the best way to verify authenticity (in this particular case) is the packaging. Both had the same package that features a series of ridges (about 4 mm wide) connecting the label pallet in the center to the curved ring that holds the string. See images. The authentic reels do not have these ridges. These packages were also cut roughly around the edges.
Quality of counterfeit varies by case. Here are other sellers - wilsonluxilon, wilsonblx, sohusports, tennisone, 163sports
Overall, if something is made in Europe but shipped from China, PROBABLY FAKE!
26.4.12
2012 NFL Mock Draft
1. IND - Andrew Luck, QB, Stanford
2. WAS - Robert Griffin III, QB, Baylor
3. MIN- Matt Kalil, OT, USC
4. CLE - Trent Richardson, RB, Alambama
5. TB - Morris Claiborne, CB, LSU
6. STL - Justin Blackmon, WR, Oklahoma State
7. JAC - Whitney Mercilus, DE, Illinois
8. MIA - Melvin Ingram, DE, South Carolina
9. CAR - Luke Kuechly, LB, Boston College
10. BUF - Stephon Gilmore, CB, South Carolina
11. KC - Mark Barron, SS, Alabama
12. SEA - Dontari Poe, DT, Memphis
13. ARI - David DeCastro, G, Stanford
14. DAL - Michael Brockers, DT, LSU
15. PHI - Quinton Coples, DE, North Carolina
16. NYJ- Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame
17. CIN - Dre Kirpatrick, CB, Alabama
18. SD - Riley Reiff, OT, Iowa
19. CHI - Chandler Jones, DE, Syracuse
20. TEN - Stephen Hill, WR, Georgia Tech
21. CIN - Cordy Glenn, G/T, Georgia
22. CLE - Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A & M
23. DET - Jonathan Martin, OT, Stanford
24. PIT - Dont’a Hightower, LB, Alabama
25. DEN - Kendall Reyes, DT, Connecticut
26. HOU - Coby Fleener, TE, Stanford
27. NE - Courtney Upshaw, OLB, Alabama
28. GB - Shea McClellen, Boise St.
29. BAL - Kevin Zeitler, G, Wisconsin
30. SF - Nick Perry, DE, USC
31. NE - Harrison Smith, S, Notre Dame
32. NYG- Doug Martin, RB, Boise State
16.3.12
Kony 2012: Scrutiny Good, 5150 Bad
It's ironic that just as the news media began touting (and scrutinizing) the undeniably polished and poignant Kony 2012 social media campaign, the campaign's figurehead, Jason Russell, incited a PR crisis with a nude public meltdown. Russell's campaign centers around bringing Joseph Kony, a villainous warlord, to justice by making him internationally infamous with a doc, poster kits, and celeb support. The "all pub is good pub" tactic comes to a screeching halt when a leader who should maintain his image and credibility ends up on TMZ pounding the pavement in the nude. Full story.
Also, the group's spending practices and motives were called into question for producing videos like this, which was removed from the Invisible Children site.
Despite harsh criticism and strong accusations of foul play, it was still an impressive demonstration of the power of social media.
How will Invisible Children handle it all?
10.7.11
The Art of War: Key Points
This famous treatise by Sun Tzu (translated by Samuel B. Griffith) on military policy and operations was written over 2,000 years ago but contains many relevant aphorisms:
The idea that a war is won before the first blows of a battle sums up the importance of planning and preparation, virtues which can translate to success in any venture. Assessing oneself and the enemy, then matching one’s strength against another’s weakness reminds me of tennis. Espionage, deception, misdirection, feigning incapacity, and fueling an enemy’s arrogance reminds me of Bill Bellichick.
Here are my seven key points of the Art of War:
1. “Know your enemy and know yourself, in a hundred battles, you will never be in peril.”
2. “All warfare is based on deception… When capable, feign incapacity. When active, feign inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near. Offer the enemy bait to lure him; feign disorder and strike him. Anger his general and confuse him. Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. When he is united, divide him.”
3. “He created cleavages between sovereign and minister, superiors and inferiors, commanders and subordinates. His spies and agents were active everywhere, gathering information, sowing dissension, and nurturing subversion. The enemy was isolated and demoralized; his will to resist broken. Thus without battle his army was conquered, his cities taken and his state overthrown.”
“An army without secret agents is exactly like a man without eyes or ears.”
(1) Doubled - It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you.”
(2) Inside - “enemy officials.”
(3) Native - “enemy’s country people.”
“The double agent knows those of his own countrymen who are covetous as well as those officials who have been remiss in office.”
(4) Living - “Men who are clever, talented, wise and able to gain access to those of the enemy who are intimate with the sovereign members of the nobility.”
(5) Expendable - “those of our own spies who are deliberately given fabricated information.”
4. For success, master the five factors:
(1) moral influence- “that which causes people to be in harmony with their leaders, so they will accompany them in life and unto death without fear of mortal peril.”
(2) weather- “the effects of Winter’s cold and summer’s heat.”
(3) terrain- “whether the ground is traversed with ease or difficulty, whether it is open or constricted.”
(4) command- “If wise (1), a commander is able to recognize changing ircumstances and to act expediently. If sincere (2), his men will have no doubt of the certainty of rewards and punishments. If humane (3), he loves mankind, sympathizes with others, and appreciates their industry and toil. If courageous (4), he gains victory by seizing opportunity without hesitation. If strict (5), his troops are disciplined because they are in awe of him and are afraid of punishment.”
(5) doctrine- “organization, control, assignment of appropriate ranks to officers, regulation of supply routes, and the provision of principal items used by the army.”
5. “For there has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited.” Long wars drain morale and funds. Brilliant strategy is never protracted.
6. “To win victory is easy; to preserve it’s fruits, difficult. And therefore it is said that when All-under-Heaven is at war, one who gains five victories suffers calamity, one who gains four is exhausted; one who gains three becomes Lord Protector; one who gains two, a King; one who gains one, the Emperor. Thus he who by countless victories has gained empire is unique, while those who have perished thereby are many.”
7. “Under certain conditions one yields a city, sacrifices a portion of his force, or gives up ground in order to gain a more valuable objective. Such yielding therefore masks a deeper purpose, and is but another aspect of the intellectual pliancy which distinguishes the expert in war.”
“Therefore, when I have won a victory I do not repeat my tactics but respond to circumstances in an infinite variety of ways. Now an army may be likened to water, for just as flowing water avoids the heights and hastens to the lowlands, so an army avoids strength and strikes weakness. And as water shapes its flow in accordance with the ground, so an army manages its victory in accordance with the situation of the enemy. And as water has no constant form, there are no constant conditions.”
The idea that a war is won before the first blows of a battle sums up the importance of planning and preparation, virtues which can translate to success in any venture. Assessing oneself and the enemy, then matching one’s strength against another’s weakness reminds me of tennis. Espionage, deception, misdirection, feigning incapacity, and fueling an enemy’s arrogance reminds me of Bill Bellichick.
Here are my seven key points of the Art of War:
1. “Know your enemy and know yourself, in a hundred battles, you will never be in peril.”
2. “All warfare is based on deception… When capable, feign incapacity. When active, feign inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near. Offer the enemy bait to lure him; feign disorder and strike him. Anger his general and confuse him. Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. When he is united, divide him.”
3. “He created cleavages between sovereign and minister, superiors and inferiors, commanders and subordinates. His spies and agents were active everywhere, gathering information, sowing dissension, and nurturing subversion. The enemy was isolated and demoralized; his will to resist broken. Thus without battle his army was conquered, his cities taken and his state overthrown.”
“An army without secret agents is exactly like a man without eyes or ears.”
(1) Doubled - It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you.”
(2) Inside - “enemy officials.”
(3) Native - “enemy’s country people.”
“The double agent knows those of his own countrymen who are covetous as well as those officials who have been remiss in office.”
(4) Living - “Men who are clever, talented, wise and able to gain access to those of the enemy who are intimate with the sovereign members of the nobility.”
(5) Expendable - “those of our own spies who are deliberately given fabricated information.”
4. For success, master the five factors:
(1) moral influence- “that which causes people to be in harmony with their leaders, so they will accompany them in life and unto death without fear of mortal peril.”
(2) weather- “the effects of Winter’s cold and summer’s heat.”
(3) terrain- “whether the ground is traversed with ease or difficulty, whether it is open or constricted.”
(4) command- “If wise (1), a commander is able to recognize changing ircumstances and to act expediently. If sincere (2), his men will have no doubt of the certainty of rewards and punishments. If humane (3), he loves mankind, sympathizes with others, and appreciates their industry and toil. If courageous (4), he gains victory by seizing opportunity without hesitation. If strict (5), his troops are disciplined because they are in awe of him and are afraid of punishment.”
(5) doctrine- “organization, control, assignment of appropriate ranks to officers, regulation of supply routes, and the provision of principal items used by the army.”
5. “For there has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited.” Long wars drain morale and funds. Brilliant strategy is never protracted.
6. “To win victory is easy; to preserve it’s fruits, difficult. And therefore it is said that when All-under-Heaven is at war, one who gains five victories suffers calamity, one who gains four is exhausted; one who gains three becomes Lord Protector; one who gains two, a King; one who gains one, the Emperor. Thus he who by countless victories has gained empire is unique, while those who have perished thereby are many.”
7. “Under certain conditions one yields a city, sacrifices a portion of his force, or gives up ground in order to gain a more valuable objective. Such yielding therefore masks a deeper purpose, and is but another aspect of the intellectual pliancy which distinguishes the expert in war.”
“Therefore, when I have won a victory I do not repeat my tactics but respond to circumstances in an infinite variety of ways. Now an army may be likened to water, for just as flowing water avoids the heights and hastens to the lowlands, so an army avoids strength and strikes weakness. And as water shapes its flow in accordance with the ground, so an army manages its victory in accordance with the situation of the enemy. And as water has no constant form, there are no constant conditions.”
25.3.11
Shane Donahue's NFL COMBINE REPORT
After discussing the ins and outs of the 2011 Combine with all the interested parties (scouts, GMs), I have created a list of my workout freaks -- welcome to the second annual Shane Donahue NFL Combine Report.
I say this every year so let me reiterate that the combine is not about identifying the best football players. These workouts put a prospect's football skills in perspective by determining how he measures up to the speed and strength at the highest level. While some of the most talented players often perform exceptionally in drills, the workout freaks who excel in the measurables of running and leaping are by no means the most talented football players. The drills measure explosiveness that translates to football skill but does not indicate such skill.
STEPHEN PAEA - DT - Oregon St. (6'1"/ 301)
I don’t care what else he did, Mr. Bench Press set the record with 49 reps of 225 pounds and made it look smooth and easy… mostly. I was not completely surprised by this performance as he put up 44 reps earlier on youtube.
VIRGIL GREEN - TE - Nevada (6’3”/ 249)
Moch is another Nevada guy who happens to be a great leaper but he made noise recording one of the fastest 40s ever for DL at 4.44 seconds. Only 15 participants of any position ran a faster 40. Even fewer people outjumped him. He had the second best overall vertical leap of 42-inches and tied for the ninth best broad jump of 10-feet-8-inches.
MARCELL DAREUS - DT - Alabama (6’3”/ 319)
Although Dareus is a potential top-10 pick, he is not a freak by numbers because he didn’t hit make the leader boards. Sometimes it’s about more than the measurables. Watch the video and you’ll see an impressive HWS (height-weight-speed) specimen. He’s nimble and he smacks the heck out of those bags.
VON MILLER LB - Texas A&M - (6’3”/ 246)
By the measurables, Kelce had the best performance of any OL but he wasn’t mentioned at all. Solder has great size and is a bonafide prospect so his workout received significant pub. Essentially, Kelce needed more size and clout to garner some respect. Hypothetically, he is built like an out of shape Miller or Green so his numbers are only impressive for that position (if Miller of Green somehow slipped as far as Andre Smith in the man boob incident).
Who’s the freakier QB - Cam Newton (Auburn) or Jake Locker (Washington)?
Newton wins this flip because on top of matching Locker drill for drill, he’s bigger.
Who’s the quickest guy in the draft - Buster Skrine ( DB, Tennessee-Chattanooga) or Jeffrey Maehl (WR Oregon)?
It’s unfortunate that it went unnoticed that each of these guys set a combine record and battled for the quickness crown. The edge goes to Skrine because he was very close to Maehl’s 3-cone record and he put up a significantly better 40 so I assume his 10-yard split was better.
I say this every year so let me reiterate that the combine is not about identifying the best football players. These workouts put a prospect's football skills in perspective by determining how he measures up to the speed and strength at the highest level. While some of the most talented players often perform exceptionally in drills, the workout freaks who excel in the measurables of running and leaping are by no means the most talented football players. The drills measure explosiveness that translates to football skill but does not indicate such skill.
I quote last year's report:
"Although many freaks will have little impact in the NFL Draft or at the next level, some freaks jump up draft boards and eventually cash in on their measurables because coaches and GMs fawn over their potential and gamble, lured by the promising ego trap that they can coach a freak into a star."
STEPHEN PAEA - DT - Oregon St. (6'1"/ 301)
I don’t care what else he did, Mr. Bench Press set the record with 49 reps of 225 pounds and made it look smooth and easy… mostly. I was not completely surprised by this performance as he put up 44 reps earlier on youtube.
VIRGIL GREEN - TE - Nevada (6’3”/ 249)
With the best vert in the draft at 42.5-inches and the third best broad jump at 10-feet-10-inches, Green is one of this class’ most explosive leapers. Among TEs, he ranked second in the 20-yard shuttle (11.63), third in the 40 (4.64), fourth in the 3-cone (6.90), and fifth in the bench press with 23 reps. By the measurables, he’s easily the most gifted at his position.
JULIO JONES - WR - Alabama (6’3”/ 200)
JULIO JONES - WR - Alabama (6’3”/ 200)
The consensus number two wideout inched closer to A.J. Green with a solid performance that’s spectacular when considering size and draft status. He basically levitated on the 11-foot-3-inch broad, the third best since 2003. Jones turned in Calvin Johnson-esque numbers with a 4.39 40 (seventh best overall) and a 38.5-inch vertical.
DONTAY MOCH - DL - Nevada (6’1”/ 248)
DONTAY MOCH - DL - Nevada (6’1”/ 248)
Moch is another Nevada guy who happens to be a great leaper but he made noise recording one of the fastest 40s ever for DL at 4.44 seconds. Only 15 participants of any position ran a faster 40. Even fewer people outjumped him. He had the second best overall vertical leap of 42-inches and tied for the ninth best broad jump of 10-feet-8-inches.
MARCELL DAREUS - DT - Alabama (6’3”/ 319)
Although Dareus is a potential top-10 pick, he is not a freak by numbers because he didn’t hit make the leader boards. Sometimes it’s about more than the measurables. Watch the video and you’ll see an impressive HWS (height-weight-speed) specimen. He’s nimble and he smacks the heck out of those bags.
VON MILLER LB - Texas A&M - (6’3”/ 246)
This year’s most-talked about pass-rushing linebacker, Miller backed up the chatter by dominating his position in nearly every category. His 11.15 60-yard shuttle set a position and was the 15th fastest overall. Among LBs, Miller ranked first in the broad jump (10’6”), first in the 3-cone (6.70), second in the 40 (4.53), third in the vert (37-inches), and third in the 20-yard shuttle (4.06). Ok, I know, that was the third guy about that size.
Freaks don’t come at every position every year so to decide between the guys who didn’t quite make the cut, here’s the toss-ups.
In the wake of Bruce Campbell and Trent Williams, who’s the freaker OL - Jason Kelce of Cincinnati or Nate Solder of Colorado?
(Parentheses denote rank among position)/ NR=new record
Freaks don’t come at every position every year so to decide between the guys who didn’t quite make the cut, here’s the toss-ups.
In the wake of Bruce Campbell and Trent Williams, who’s the freaker OL - Jason Kelce of Cincinnati or Nate Solder of Colorado?
| | HT | WT | 40-yd D | Vert | Broad | 3-Cone | 20-yd S |
| Jason Kelce | 6’3” | 280 | 4.93 (1) | 30.5" (t8) | 9’2” (t3) | 7.22 (1) | 4.14(NR) |
| Nate Solder | 6’8” | 319 | 5.05 (4) | 32" (t3) | 9’2” (t3) | 7.44 (t5) | 4.34 (2)
|
By the measurables, Kelce had the best performance of any OL but he wasn’t mentioned at all. Solder has great size and is a bonafide prospect so his workout received significant pub. Essentially, Kelce needed more size and clout to garner some respect. Hypothetically, he is built like an out of shape Miller or Green so his numbers are only impressive for that position (if Miller of Green somehow slipped as far as Andre Smith in the man boob incident).
Who’s the freakier QB - Cam Newton (Auburn) or Jake Locker (Washington)?
| | HT | WT | 40-yd D | Vert | Broad | 3-Cone | 20-yd S |
| Cam Newton | 6’5” | 248 | 4.59 (t3) | 35" (t3) | 10’6” (1) | 6.92 (10) | 4.18 (t8) |
| Jake Locker | 6’3” | 231 | 4.59 (t3) | 35" (t3) | 10’ (t4) | 6.77 (1) | 4.12 (t3) |
Newton wins this flip because on top of matching Locker drill for drill, he’s bigger.
Who’s the quickest guy in the draft - Buster Skrine ( DB, Tennessee-Chattanooga) or Jeffrey Maehl (WR Oregon)?
| | HT | WT | 3-Cone | 20-yd S | 60-yd S | 40-yd D |
| Buster Skrine | 5’10” | 186 | 6.44 (2) | 3.90 (t2) | 10.75 (NR) | 4.48 |
| Jeffrey Maehl | 6’1” | 190 | 6.42 (NR) | 3.94 (4) | 10.88 (3) | 4.62 |
It’s unfortunate that it went unnoticed that each of these guys set a combine record and battled for the quickness crown. The edge goes to Skrine because he was very close to Maehl’s 3-cone record and he put up a significantly better 40 so I assume his 10-yard split was better.
That wraps up this year's report. Stay tuned for my Mock Draft to see which freaks crack the first round.
28.2.11
The Outlier of SC's Top Ten Plays
One day a couple months ago while counting the number of Division I ballers who major in sociology, I found an outlier on UCLA. Tyler Trapani is a history major. He also looks like a doughy bundle of privilege who wouldn’t scare anyone if he walked onto an intramural team as a ringer. Curious, I began to read his bio. The summaries of his two college seasons are identical with the exception of the opponent’s name and date:
Trapani made one appearance without any starts as a walk-on for the Bruins, playing a total of one minute on the season ... he played in the final minute of the John R. Wooden Classic at Honda Center in Anaheim, Calif., in the Bruins' win over DePaul (Dec. 13) ... missed his only field goal attempt, a three-pointer, against the Blue Demons ... did not record any other statistics.
So he’s not quite good enough for the 30-30 club (the human victory cigars who play when the team is up or down 30 with 30 seconds remaining) and he desperately (I assume) chucked up a three in each of his two appearances. Well, if he walked on, he was probably good in high school right? Nope:
averaged 3.4 ppg, 2.0 rpg and 2.5 apg his senior season in 20 games ... helped lead Simi Valley to a 26-2 record, including a perfect 14-0 mark in Miramonte League play ... shot at a 30.2 percent clip from three-point range, sinking 16-of-53 treys.
Did he really help lead Simi Valley?
How is this guy on UCLA? Did he win a contest or something? Well kind of, here’s the golden ticket, buried near the bottom of his thin bio:
his great-grandfather is the late legendary UCLA head coach, John R. Wooden
On Saturday I was surprised to see Trapani made Sportscenter’s Top Ten and had a feature on ESPN.com because he scored the final basket in Pauley Pavilion before the renovation. He caught an airball right under the basket and promptly regurgitated it with barely enough hangtime to slip a piece of paper under him.
Columnists, the coach, and family have interpreted this happening as an example of divine intervention-- but by a different god, Wooden.
Trapani credits his basketball IQ:
"I didn't think about it at all," he said. "When I got the ball, it was just instinct to put it back up there."
His wide open layup is a win for all the piggybacking descendents of legends, and more importantly, the real student athletes. At the press conference, his teammates snickered when Trapani said, “It’s more about being here for getting an education and going on in life.”
His teammates all had to score more than two points to earn an invite to the press conference.
7.2.11
Superbowl Commercials
Don't let anyone tell you it was a good game and don't let em tell you the commercials were good either. The game had no lead changes. It was a blowout that was tense and almost exciting at the end.
The ads offered no redemption for the event. Many of the commercials were leaked before the Superbowl. That defeats the purpose. Most commercials tried too hard to be funny and ended up face-planting. And Blaine Gabbert is no Teblow because he didn't even have a commercial.
Here are my two favorites:
ONE
Despite borrowing shot for shot the opening to a certain show, they still pulled it off. Here's the problem: the car ripped off the style of its former partner company by copying the Benz grille. The wannabe Bentley/ Aston Martin logo isn't fooling anyone either. Is it not enough that the 300 looks like a poor man's Maybach!?
TWO
The ads offered no redemption for the event. Many of the commercials were leaked before the Superbowl. That defeats the purpose. Most commercials tried too hard to be funny and ended up face-planting. And Blaine Gabbert is no Teblow because he didn't even have a commercial.
Here are my two favorites:
ONE
Despite borrowing shot for shot the opening to a certain show, they still pulled it off. Here's the problem: the car ripped off the style of its former partner company by copying the Benz grille. The wannabe Bentley/ Aston Martin logo isn't fooling anyone either. Is it not enough that the 300 looks like a poor man's Maybach!?
TWO
This is a silly and simple concept that ended up being memorable.
Since the Probowl was last week, people think football is over. Actually, as we move into Draft Season, it's just heating up.
3.8.10
Food Inc. vs. Troll 2
Not too long after Troll 2 rocked my world, I watched the documentary Food, Inc. which goes beyond the grocery aisle to expose the evils of food production in the US. While at first glance, Food, Inc. may seem completely unrelated to Troll 2 but a closer look shows that the two films fight out of opposing corners of the same ring. In Troll 2, vegetarians from a rural farming community who hold sermons about the dangers of smoked meat are portrayed as villains. In Troll 2, going green is bad and a double-decker bologna sandwich with all its cholesterol and toxins saves the day.
The Goblin Queen is right: bologna is not the healthiest deli meat. That's quite the secret weapon, Josh.
There's no pastoral fantasy of an agrarian society at this market; it's the real deal except for the industrial size container of green food coloring.
I don't see the evil in making food affordable with efficient mass production techniques that minimize the land area used.
3.7.10
Troll 2: The Best Worst Movie I Have Ever Seen
About a week ago, I watched Troll 2 for the first time. For those of you who are behind the times, Troll 2 is a cult classic widely recognized as the “worst movie ever made.” The Troll 2 craze is picking up steam as the film was recently released to DVD and featured in the documentary Best Worst Movie made by the film’s child star. As a proud owner, I have seen Troll 2 four times so far and not once against my will: the first time with my father, the next time in the background while cleaning my room, and the last two times with various friends because I was worried an awful little girl might come after me if I didn’t share the film with a certain number of people. I know most of the signature lines and incorporate them into my daily interactions whenever possible. Yeah, it’s pretty cool.
While the movie lives up to the billing as the “worst movie of all time;” it also earns the documentary’s claim Best Worst Movie because I somehow found it engrossing and ridiculously entertaining. Although the film failed on many fronts, the filmmakers were by no means incompetent and amateur. I haven’t seen the documentary yet, but it seems like the filmmakers actually overachieved with their budget. For the effort and guts to finish the project, I commend them. Here is my list of the Top 5 Troll 2 Redeeming Qualities:
While the movie lives up to the billing as the “worst movie of all time;” it also earns the documentary’s claim Best Worst Movie because I somehow found it engrossing and ridiculously entertaining. Although the film failed on many fronts, the filmmakers were by no means incompetent and amateur. I haven’t seen the documentary yet, but it seems like the filmmakers actually overachieved with their budget. For the effort and guts to finish the project, I commend them. Here is my list of the Top 5 Troll 2 Redeeming Qualities:
1. Joshua’s Realizations:
Words to live by: "You can't piss on hospitality. I won't allow it."
Although the goblin spelled backwards bit could be a coincidence, the clover shaped moles are a dead giveaway.
2. Joshua’s Singing:
"Row Your Boat" is always a good choice for diffusing an argument.
3. The Kinky Sex Scene:
This is the strangest thing I have ever seen in a movie.
4. The Creepy Messages on Softballs
Sinister messages written on softballs in green frosting is always a bad omen.
5. The Acting and Snappy Dialogue
Words to live by: "You can't piss on hospitality. I won't allow it."
Elliot is another victim of the either-or fallacy.
The director wanted to use non-actor civilians for a natural feel. I like how the light switch bookends the scene.
2.7.10
The Fed's Grace
Watch live streaming video from wimbledon at livestream.com
Berdych had the second interview and I like how the reporters condense the parts of Fed's interview that were potentially insulting and bounce them off Berdych in hopes of instigating an an entertaining back and forth. Next the reporters should do a follow-up with Fed and ask for his response to Berdych's claims that he is the superior player.
The Fed is one of the most gracious losers this sport…. no any sport… has ever known. He also gives great interviews. In this post, I break down the Fed’s interview after his 4-set loss to Tomas Berdych.
Notice how he wears his hat low to hide the waterworks.
4:37 “No, he didn’t play like that, you saw a different match.” Actually, I’m pretty sure that was you out there I saw getting worked! Poor reporter, a zinger from a weepy eyed paper champ might just ruin his day. He didn’t know to direct all string technology questions to John McEnroe because he mentions “these new-age strings” in every broadcast. While he’s at it, he should also ask Mac about legs because Berdych has tree trunks and Mac probably noticed.
7:45 It must be annoying to be asked about Murray’s chances of winning it all right after losing so this question deserves a snarky response like the one Fed gave. To top it off, he told the reporter to “make [her] homework” because she probably has no idea what she’s talking about.
5:43 Okay, so at RG, the conditions were tough and Soderling played well. “Today was a different story,” we can attribute today’s loss to aches and pains that resulted in general discomfort and poor play at crucial moments of the match preventing the Fed from capitalizing on certain opportunities.
3:10 His right leg and back have been hurting since the final he lost to Hewitt at Halle. I hope he gets back to playing tennis “freely,” “the way [he] wants.”
7:20 If Virtua Tennis is realistic, that two-week vacation should cost $1000 and fully regenerate his energy. Staying at home is free but not as rejuvenating.
Notice how he wears his hat low to hide the waterworks.
4:37 “No, he didn’t play like that, you saw a different match.” Actually, I’m pretty sure that was you out there I saw getting worked! Poor reporter, a zinger from a weepy eyed paper champ might just ruin his day. He didn’t know to direct all string technology questions to John McEnroe because he mentions “these new-age strings” in every broadcast. While he’s at it, he should also ask Mac about legs because Berdych has tree trunks and Mac probably noticed.
7:45 It must be annoying to be asked about Murray’s chances of winning it all right after losing so this question deserves a snarky response like the one Fed gave. To top it off, he told the reporter to “make [her] homework” because she probably has no idea what she’s talking about.
5:43 Okay, so at RG, the conditions were tough and Soderling played well. “Today was a different story,” we can attribute today’s loss to aches and pains that resulted in general discomfort and poor play at crucial moments of the match preventing the Fed from capitalizing on certain opportunities.
3:10 His right leg and back have been hurting since the final he lost to Hewitt at Halle. I hope he gets back to playing tennis “freely,” “the way [he] wants.”
7:20 If Virtua Tennis is realistic, that two-week vacation should cost $1000 and fully regenerate his energy. Staying at home is free but not as rejuvenating.
Berdych had the second interview and I like how the reporters condense the parts of Fed's interview that were potentially insulting and bounce them off Berdych in hopes of instigating an an entertaining back and forth. Next the reporters should do a follow-up with Fed and ask for his response to Berdych's claims that he is the superior player.
25.6.10
NBA Draft Spoiler Ticker
I felt compelled to send ESPN this suggestion/ complaint because I was that annoyed by the NBA Draft ticker on the bottom of the screen that gave away the picks of the draft as I was watching the replay.
--------------- Original Message ---------------
I was watching the replay of the NBA Draft on ESPN at 12 am PST but there was a draft ticker on the bottom of the screen that reported all of the picks by team. I was watching this replay because I did not watch the draft live so I did not yet know what happened. Would someone who has not yet seen an event such as the draft want to watch it with a spoiler ticker at the bottom of the screen that tells the outcome? No, that would be stupid. My suggestion is do not make this mistake again.
I was surprised to receive any kind of response, not to mention one so prompt.
Dear Shane,
Thank you for contacting us.
Fans turn to us, as well as many other news sources, for the latest information in sports news. The results of the NBA Draft fall in that category. As a general rule we will make an exception and not show the results while the event is being televised on our air. We understand that not everyone may agree with our editorial decision. We do thank you for sharing your perspective with us.
Sincerely,
Eric
ESPN Viewer Response
Yes Eric, I know that you usually remove the results from the bottom ticker during replays. That’s the smart thing to do. You dropped the ball this time. How about an apology? I think if any other news sources or fans needed information about the draft after midnight well after the event, they wouldn’t go to the bottom ticker of the draft replay, they could quickly check online. What “other news source” would need to sit through a scrolling ticker after midnight several hours after the event and after their deadline?
Sure Hannah, you’re welcome for my “perspective” and you’re still wrong, Eric.
--------------- Original Message ---------------
I was watching the replay of the NBA Draft on ESPN at 12 am PST but there was a draft ticker on the bottom of the screen that reported all of the picks by team. I was watching this replay because I did not watch the draft live so I did not yet know what happened. Would someone who has not yet seen an event such as the draft want to watch it with a spoiler ticker at the bottom of the screen that tells the outcome? No, that would be stupid. My suggestion is do not make this mistake again.
I was surprised to receive any kind of response, not to mention one so prompt.
Dear Shane,
Thank you for contacting us.
Fans turn to us, as well as many other news sources, for the latest information in sports news. The results of the NBA Draft fall in that category. As a general rule we will make an exception and not show the results while the event is being televised on our air. We understand that not everyone may agree with our editorial decision. We do thank you for sharing your perspective with us.
Sincerely,
Eric
ESPN Viewer Response
Yes Eric, I know that you usually remove the results from the bottom ticker during replays. That’s the smart thing to do. You dropped the ball this time. How about an apology? I think if any other news sources or fans needed information about the draft after midnight well after the event, they wouldn’t go to the bottom ticker of the draft replay, they could quickly check online. What “other news source” would need to sit through a scrolling ticker after midnight several hours after the event and after their deadline?
Sure Hannah, you’re welcome for my “perspective” and you’re still wrong, Eric.
The Fearhand
I guess this is what Brad Gilbert calls the forehand nowadays. I don’t dislike it. Well, maybe I kinda like it. I looked it up and it only applies to big forehands, which most players on the men’s circuit have.
This is my friend Syrym's fearhand.
This is my friend Syrym's fearhand.
firehannahstorm.com
I almost changed the name of my blog to firehannahstorm.com because she is single-handedly ruining my Wimbledon viewing experience. I never really noticed her before but as the Isner-Mahut epic was in the process of changing stations to make space for the World Cup, Storm burst on the scene and polluted the air with an endless supply of useless, clichéd fluff and filler. While displaying hardly any tennis knowledge and shying away from any substantive analysis, her color consisted of overusing “perspective” and gushing about this or that. Hannah, this isn’t the Early Show.
When I was watching the Nadal-Haase match, ESPN cut to an interview with Isner on set. I missed most of the third set because Storm had to ask Isner the same dam questions the presenter asked him on court after his match. Guess what Hannah, Isner’s answers to those questions did not change. Thirty minutes and a shower did not give him a new “perspective.” And yes, he still felt tired.
And what kind of name is Hannah Storm anyway? Was she originally in the adult film industry? Well I looked it up and apparently her real name is Storen.
Unfortunately or fortunately, I am not the first to criticize Hannah Storm.
This is a picture I took of Isner doing what he does best at the 2007 US Open. At that time, serving and getting mini-breaks were the ONLY things he did well.
When I was watching the Nadal-Haase match, ESPN cut to an interview with Isner on set. I missed most of the third set because Storm had to ask Isner the same dam questions the presenter asked him on court after his match. Guess what Hannah, Isner’s answers to those questions did not change. Thirty minutes and a shower did not give him a new “perspective.” And yes, he still felt tired.
And what kind of name is Hannah Storm anyway? Was she originally in the adult film industry? Well I looked it up and apparently her real name is Storen.
Unfortunately or fortunately, I am not the first to criticize Hannah Storm.
This is a picture I took of Isner doing what he does best at the 2007 US Open. At that time, serving and getting mini-breaks were the ONLY things he did well.
22.4.10
Full Mock!
Live from the draft, the first pick was just announced and I barely handed in my picks at the Pick 'Em Contest. I logged into some wifi and here is my post:
After my talks with Mel, Todd, and many a draft enthusiast, my top 10 has not changed. I have added picks 11-32 which are rarely predicted correctly and therefore need no explanation.
The two players on my radar, Tim Tebow and Jahvid Best, did not crack my first round but my counterpart Greg and I entertained the possibility of Best to the Pats and Tebow to the Vikes or Saints.
Greg and I also also discussed trades in the ranges 4-7, 13-15, 22-23.
1. St. Louis Rams-Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma-I don’t like the pick personally but apparently it’s a given that the Rams take him. DYK: His great grandmother was Cherokee.
2. Detroit Lions-Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska-They could go OT but Suh is arguably the best player in the draft and it fills a need.
3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers-Gerald McCoy, DT, Oklahoma-This 3-Tech Tackle draws comparisons to Sapp because apparently his style meshes with their defense scheme.
4. Washington Redskins-Russell Okung, OT, Oklahoma State-The Skins need to replace Samuels and protect McNabb’s back side, that one he’s blind on.
5. Kansas City Chiefs-Trent Williams, OT, Oklahoma-If I know Scott Pioli like I think I do, they pass on a S like Berry and go with the cornerstone position of their franchise. People say Bulaga is a Pioli-type guy, they don’t know him like I do.
6. Seattle Seahawks-Eric Berry, S, Tennessee-Well it won’t be Taylor Mays. They could go OT or secondary but it should be the Ed Reed-esque ball-hawking center fielder.
7. Cleveland Browns-Dez Bryant, WR, Oklahoma State-Since when are OK and OK State so good at football? Bryant was suspended last year for an undisclosed chat with Deion Sanders and has baggage or something but he’s immensely talented… great catch radius.
8. Oakland Raiders-Anthony Davis, OT, Rutgers-Oh boy… Bryant and Berry are off the board. (Bryant was too slow anyway but his baggage was intriguing). The media has exhausted the speculation that the Raiders will reach for someone physically gifted in running in a straight line for 40 yards. Enough, Al Davis goes conservative here picks the natural knee-bending road grader out of Rutgers. There are whispers of Bulaga, child please, another stiff, white OT from the state of Iowa. There are murmurs Clausen, hmm… child please he won’t even go in the first round.
9. Buffalo Bills- Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame-Not a great pick considering he’s a fair weather QB but this is the best option for this franchise. I remember in 2007 when Miami was in this same position at the same pick… I was a perfect 8-8 in my mock and then they took Ted Ginn Jr. instead of Brady Quinn. Look how that turned out.
10. Jacksonville Jaguars- Rolando McClain, LB, Alabama-He’s a Jack Del Rio type of player and they’ll be look for defense in Thomas or Morgan unless they go offense with Spiller.
11. Denver Broncos- Earl Thomas, S, Texas
12. Miami Dolphins- Sergio Kindle, OLB, Texas
13. San Francisco 49ers, Joe Haden, CB, Florida
14. Seattle Seahawks- C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson
15. New York Giants- Jason Pierre-Paul, DE, USF
16. Tennessee Titans- Kyle Wilson, CB, Boise St.
17. San Francisco 49ers- Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa
18. Pittsburgh Steelers- Maurkice Pouncey, C, Florida
19. Atlanta Falcons- Derrick Morgan, DE, Georgia Tech
20. Houston Texans- Ryan Matthews, RB, Fresno St.
21. Cincinnati Bengals- Jermaine Gresham, TE, Oklahoma
22. New England Patriots- Brandon Graham, DE, Michigan
23. Green Bay Packers- Mike Iupati, G, Idaho
24. Philadelphia Eagles- Devin McCourty, CB, Rutgers
25. Baltimore Ravens- Dan Williams, DT, Tennessee
26. Arizona Cardinals- Sean Weatherspoon, OLB, Missouri
27. Dallas Cowboys- Bruce Campbell, OT, Maryland
28. San Diego Chargers- Terrence Cody, NT, Alabama
29. New York Jets- Everson Griffen, DE, USC
30. Minnesota Vikings- Taylor Mays, S, USC
31. Indianapolis Colts- Charles Brown, OT
32. New Orleans Saints- Jerry Hughes, DE, TCU
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)